Navigation by alphabet

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
G-type shells in shell-and-tube heat exchangers: Gaddis, E S, Galerkin method, for heat conduction finite-element calculations, Galileo number, Gas-liquid flows: Gas-liquid-solid interfaces, fouling at, Gas-solid interfaces, fouling at, Gas tungsten arc welding, Gaseous fuels, properties of, Gases: Gaskets: Gauss-Seidel method, for solution of implicit equations, Geometric optics models for radiative heat transfer from surfaces, geothermal brines, fouling of heat exchangers by, Germany, Federal Republic of, mechanical design of heat exchangers in: Gersten, K, Girth flanges, in shell-and-tube heat exchangers, Glass production, furnaces and kilns for, Glycerol (glycerine): Gn (heat generation number), Gnielinski, V Gnielinski correlation, for heat transfer in tube banks, Gomez-Thodas method, for vapour pressure, Goodness factor, as a basis for comparison of plate fin heat exchanger surfaces, Goody narrow band model for gas radiation properties, Gorenflo correlation, for nucleate boiling, Gowenlock, R, Graetz number: Granular products, moving, heat transfer to, Graphite, density of, Grashof number Gravitational acceleration, effect in pool boiling, Gravity conveyor: Gregorig effect in enhancement of condensation, Grid baffles: Grid selection, for finite difference method, Griffin, J M, Groeneveld correlation for postdryout heat transfer, Groeneveld and Delorme correlation for postdryout heat transfer, Gross plastic deformation Group contribution parameters tables, Guerrieri and Talty correlations for forced convective heat transfer in two-phase flow, Gungor and Winterton correlation, for forced convective boiling, Gylys, J,

Index

HEDH
A B C D E F G
G-type shells in shell-and-tube heat exchangers: Gaddis, E S, Galerkin method, for heat conduction finite-element calculations, Galileo number, Gas-liquid flows: Gas-liquid-solid interfaces, fouling at, Gas-solid interfaces, fouling at, Gas tungsten arc welding, Gaseous fuels, properties of, Gases: Gaskets: Gauss-Seidel method, for solution of implicit equations, Geometric optics models for radiative heat transfer from surfaces, geothermal brines, fouling of heat exchangers by, Germany, Federal Republic of, mechanical design of heat exchangers in: Gersten, K, Girth flanges, in shell-and-tube heat exchangers, Glass production, furnaces and kilns for, Glycerol (glycerine): Gn (heat generation number), Gnielinski, V Gnielinski correlation, for heat transfer in tube banks, Gomez-Thodas method, for vapour pressure, Goodness factor, as a basis for comparison of plate fin heat exchanger surfaces, Goody narrow band model for gas radiation properties, Gorenflo correlation, for nucleate boiling, Gowenlock, R, Graetz number: Granular products, moving, heat transfer to, Graphite, density of, Grashof number Gravitational acceleration, effect in pool boiling, Gravity conveyor: Gregorig effect in enhancement of condensation, Grid baffles: Grid selection, for finite difference method, Griffin, J M, Groeneveld correlation for postdryout heat transfer, Groeneveld and Delorme correlation for postdryout heat transfer, Gross plastic deformation Group contribution parameters tables, Guerrieri and Talty correlations for forced convective heat transfer in two-phase flow, Gungor and Winterton correlation, for forced convective boiling, Gylys, J,
H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Heat Transfer for non-Newtonian Fluids

DOI 10.1615/hedhme.a.000179

2.5.12 Heat transfer for non-Newtonian fluids

A. Introduction

(by R. C. Armstrong and H. H. Winter)

Section 179 describes ways in which heat transfer in non-Newtonian fluids is different from that in Newtonian fluids. As polymers constitute the largest class of non-Newtonian fluids, we shall focus our attention on them. Moreover, we shall focus on differences in heat transfer characteristics between Newtonian and polymeric fluids that can be attributed to differences in viscous behavior between these two classes of fluids. These distinctions involve both the shear rate dependence that is commonly observed in non-Newtonian fluids and also the different magnitude of the viscosity in polymers as opposed to low-molecular-weight fluids. In addition to these viscous effects, it is clearly possible that many interesting changes in heat transfer problems could result from the "elastic" character of polymeric fluids. For example, in duct flows involving noncircular cross sections, certain non-Newtonian fluids show qualitatively different secondary velocity patterns than Newtonian fluids. These clearly have some effect on heat transfer. Very little can yet be said quantitatively about these "elastic" effects, however.*

In addition to these differences in heat transfer between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, there are differences in the kinds of information that we are generally interested in for nonisothermal flows of these two classes of fluids. Let us break the possible calculations into two categories: global and local. For Newtonian fluids it is the global result, the evaluation of a heat transfer coefficient to relate bulk temperature differences to heat fluxes, that is of most interest. This heat transfer coefficient, which is used for sizing heat exchanger equipment and estimating bulk temperature changes, is not as useful for non-Newtonian fluids for two reasons: first, in problems with significant viscous heating, which are common for molten polymers, the heat transfer coefficient cannot be defined meaningfully; and second, because of the peculiar physical properties of polymers, heat transfer between a flowing polymer and its surroundings is generally ignored. There are, of course, exceptions to this last statement, such as cooling extruders for low-temperature extrusion of foamed polymers and cooling of polymerization reactors.

For polymeric fluids, evaluation of the local temperature field is usually of primary interest. Because of the sensitivity of the physical properties to temperature, the temperature field can have a pronounced effect on the flow field and therefore on the process itself. In addition, many polymers are temperature sensitive and will degrade at high temperatures, say, at Tdegrad. It is important to be sure that the local temperature never exceeds Tdegrad. Finally, relaxation phenomena in polymers are strongly temperature sensitive, and the amount and location of residual stress or strain in a polymeric product will depend on the local temperature history of the polymer.

... You need a subscriptionOpen in a new tab. to view the full text of the article. If you already have the subscription, please login here